Do Matthew and Paul have Different Views of the Fulfillment/Abolition of the Old Covenant?

Thom Stark and I are discussing issues of inerrancy over on, you guessed it, Daniel O. McClellan’s blog here. Daniel has a way of pushing my buttons 🙂 by raising these important issues. Thom is arguing that Matthew and Paul have very different (contradictory) perspectives on the Law. The former does not set aside the Law, while the latter does. I post this announcement now, and I will come back and update this post with a reflection or two from the exchange.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s